Math 557 Sep 17
Completing Theories
Key Concepts
We previously defined the term model \(\mathcal{A}\). It holds that for any atomic sentence \(\sigma\), \[\mathcal{A} \models \sigma \quad \iff \quad T \vdash \sigma\]
Trying to extend this to arbitrary sentence via induction, the negation case looks like \[\mathcal{A} \models \neg\sigma \; \iff \; \mathcal{A} \nvDash \sigma \; \overset{\text{ind hyp}}{\iff} \; T \nvdash \sigma\] We would like to show that this is equivalent to \(T \vdash \neg\sigma\).
One direction follows from \(T\) being consistent, but for the other direction, \(T\) may not be strong enough to prove this.
We therefore need to extend \(T\) to a complete theory.